Tag Archives: law firm recruiting

Good Legal Recruiting and Your Unique Selling Proposition

Even while you may be a good candidate, it is also extremely important that you are differentiates from other candidates. Good recruiters distinguish their candidates from all the rest. A really exceptional recruiter makes their candidates special in the eyes of law firms.

You should always work with recruiters who understand thid.

That is why using a recruiter is the single most effective way to get a job if the legal recruiter is good at their work. When a good legal recruiter is involved, the candidate can get many more interviews and job offers than they would if they sent themselves on their own or used an average legal recruiter.

Through our letters and packaging of our candidates we have the ability to make our candidates stand out and get more offers.

Every Candidate Needs a Strong Unique Selling Proposition

How does a good recruiter get their candidates differentiated? By creating a Unique Selling Proposition - or USP.

A USP is that distinct and appealing idea that sets you favorably apart from every other candidate who is approaching the law firm either on their own or through another recruiting firm. The long-term successes our recruiters to achieve for their candidates will, ultimately, be helped or hurt by the USP they decide upon for each candidate.

This is what good legal recruiting is all about.

The possibilities for building a USP are unlimited. It’s best, however, to adopt a USP that dynamically addresses an obvious void other candidates for the position may have that a recruiter’s candidate can honestly fill. Beware: It’s actually counter-productive for a recruiter to adopt a USP if their candidate will not appear to fulfill the promise once they interview.

Most candidates represented on their own or through other recruiters don’t have a USP, only a “me too,” rudderless, nondescript, unappealing letter that feeds solely upon the sheer momentum of the law firm with an opening. There’s nothing unique; there’s nothing distinct. They promise no great value, benefit, or service — just “hire x candidate” for no justifiable, rational reason other than a good law school or experience from a given law firm.

It’s no surprise then that most recruiters, lacking the ability to attach a compelling USP to their candidates, merely get by. Their failure rate is high, their recruiters are apathetic and grasp at every straw, and they get only a small share of the potential business. But other than recruiter’s pedigree or the firm they work for, why should any legal recruiter be in business or even practicing our profession if they fail to market their candidates in any appealing way, with unique features and abilities?

Would you want to patronize a recruiting firm that’s just “there,” with no unique benefit, no ability to market your unique strengths, no especially comforting counsel, no persuasive ability and no ability to synthesize your unique strengths? Or would you prefer a firm that makes you appear to be a superstar fulfilling the law firms hiring needs? Or one with the most jobs, the best recruiters and recruiters who actually CARE about the work that they are doing? Or one that represents the “Rolls Royce” of attorneys?

With each candidate we represent we reduce their USP to its sinewy bare essence.

Try it. With paper and pen, prepare a one-paragraph statement of your USP.

The USP is the hardest thing to write and generally goes into the summary section of our letters.It is the most important part of the letter.At first, you will have trouble expressing it tightly and specifically. It may take two or three paragraphs or more. That’s okay.

Our recruiters ruthlessly edit away the generalities, and tenaciously focus on the crispest, clearest, most specific promise the candidate could possibly hold out. Then, they rework it and hack away the excess verbiage or hazy statements until they have a clearly defined, clearly apparent USP a law firms can immediately seize upon. And then, they integrate this USP into each paragraph of the letter, repeat it when they speak with law firms about their candidate, drill this into their candidates as something they should talk about in interviews..

However, remember this axiom: You will not appeal to everybody. In fact, certain USPs are designed to appeal to only one segment of law firms. There is a vast gulf between law firms, and any USP probably can’t reach them all. To our recruiters we ask “Which do you want to stake out as your candidate’s market niche?”

Our recruiters also analyze the market potential of various USP positions in terms of interviews and offers.

Immediately following a placement write, we try to call or visit the law firms. During this follow-up effort, we do our best to see to it that the law firm feels important and special, and that they are “resold” on the value of the hire they just made. We repeat the candidate’s USP and remind the law firm how it helped them make their hiring decision. We reassure law firms about their wise decisions, and show how the same USP that served them this time will be there to serve them in the future.

Good marketing requires that you give law firms rational reasons for their emotional hiring decision. There is a formula for success, and the USP related effectively by recruiters is truly an integral part of that formula.

What’s On Your Facebook Page?

The National Law Journal recently published an article (http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202423725315&pos=ataglance) which discussed the fact that jury consultants and trial lawyers are now researching social networking sites and personal blogs to assist them in the voir dire process. Conducting Internet research has proven very useful by providing trial lawyers with valuable insight about potential jurors that is not readily apparent through voir dire. It appears that what people post on their MySpace or Facebook pages is far different from what they state on their jury questionnaires. For example, the article mentions a case where the defense successfully had a juror dismissed after discovering that the juror had lied on her questionnaire through an Internet search.

Jury consultants and trial lawyers are not the only ones who are using Internet research in this manner. Law firms often use the Internet as well to conduct informal background searches on potential lateral candidates. More and more firms are searching the Internet, especially social networking sites and personal blogs, to gain better insight into a potential candidate. Thus, before you start your job search, it is very important that the public information on your Facebook or MySpace page does not contain anything that you would not want a potential employer to know. After all, you never know who may be googling your name next.

Stages of Life: Non-Attorney to Attorney to Recruiter

This weekend, I had the opportunity to revisit my pre-law school life. Between college and law school, I took four years off to live in Boston and D.C. and work for a nonprofit organization. It was that experience that ultimately led me to a career in tax and corporate law. It was incredible to become acquainted with the girl I was before law school and my law practice took over my life. I visited with old friends today who have never heard me talk about bar exams, billable hours, due diligence trips, merger agreements, etc. It was fascinating!

Life wasn’t better then - but it was surely different and less busy!

My friends and acquaintances will tell you that I am not a philosophical person. But, I believe that, as attorneys, our common experiences bond us. For this reason, I generally recommend that associates and partners work with a recruiter who was a practicing attorney (whether or not a BCG recruiter) - with, of course, a few exceptions. I think that former attorneys can bring an interesting perspective to our work as recruiters gained through many hours of one-the-job training (and schooling!) We’ve been there!

Personally, I enjoy speaking with attorneys who remain in practice - especially my fellow BigLaw tax and corporate attorneys. And I have a big soft spot for my fellow Fordham Law alums! I have sat in your seat - and feel incredibly qualified to help you craft the career that you want.