Tag Archives: career advice

The Boutique Alternative

Undoubtedly, most of my conversations with candidates involve whether or not they will be able to find a job in 2010 — and how today’s market compares to 2009/2008.  The going commentary is that the first 8 weeks of 2010 have been markedly more active than 2009 (which was essentially a flat-line on the associate hiring side of the coin).  While this bit of information should lift some eyebrows and produce chants of joy, I find more and more candidates have become disillusioned with the job market and disgruntled with New York Big Law in general — leading to feelings of “leaving the practice,” “moving away,” or “taking time off until Big Law starts hiring again.” 

All of this confuses me and here is why:  Big Law is not the only game in town.  That’s a fact!  It’s a fact that bears repeating:  BIG LAW IS NOT THE ONLY GAME IN TOWN. 

Big Law occupies only a small percentage of the overall law firm populace.  In fact, outside of that small percentage, you can find boutique firms, middle market firms, small firms, solo practitioners, virtual law practices, and any number of other “opportunities.”  However, people forget this fact, and we all need to be reminded of what truly exists out there.  Granted, it may not be where you saw yourself upon graduating from law school.  However, these often overlooked places offer real jobs, real opportunities, and real experience.

For anyone who grew up in small town America (that would be me) in the late 70s/early 80s when the steel mills were closing, we saw our parents and our friends’ parents lose their pensions and their livelihood when the steel mills shut down.  What else did we see?  We saw those same parents finding other jobs…anywhere they could.  Some left their professional jobs with corporations for solo practices as consultants.  Some left their career-inspired jobs to do free-lance writing or dedicate their 9 to 5 to other income-producing pursuits.  Others stayed in the professional world but in entirely different professional roles.  The bottom line here is that people did whatever they could to keep moving forward, and a little while later when the economy evened out and jobs were hopping again, some of them moved back into the roles they had originally but with different employers.  Some of them enjoyed their new work too much to make a change backward.  All of the above-referenced parents retired with professional accolades and a pension at the end of the day.  A friend of mine described this single-mindedness as follows (and as told to him by his father):  When you don’t know what to do, DO SOMETHING. 

What does this mean for lawyers right now?  It means that Big Law isn’t the only game in town, and if Big Law is hiring selectively and slowly right now, that’s okay.  Other opportunities exist so be mindful of them, look for them, interview for them, stay connected, involved, committed to your career.  Be flexible, open-minded, and see yourself in the larger picture.  Hopefully, the legal job market will continue to make careful steps toward improvement and hiring, but, until then, you cannot put your life or career on hold.  As they say, the character of a man or woman is not measured by success, but by adversity.  I believe that to be true, and it also bears repeating.

Finding Your Area of the Law–the How and When!

I had a call from a very nice new 2008 JD grad from a fine school yesterday. In describing his goals, he stated he didn’t know if he wanted to do transactional work or litigation but hoped to get into a major firm and try on these practices to make up his mind.
Although this makes sense in many career areas; in law, this type of exploration at this point in your career may not be possible. I had to learn this the hard way also. I was deep into a medical career, and after 20 years I knew I had to make a change, but was so swamped in the daily grind that I didn’t have time to explore just what I thought I might want to do in the law. Getting through the LSAT, applying and getting accepted at a decent law school was about all I could pull off in my spare time. I figured that once in school; life would simmer down, I could explore different practice possibilities and by the time three years passed, I would have a plan. Wrong.
Imagine my surprise when they announced a few weeks after my arrival at law school that we “had to wait until December” to apply for our first summer position. I soon learned that if I didn’t move quickly in pursuing a long-term job-seeking strategy, certain career options would most likely be off the table for good. These options included coveted big firm positions, certain sought after public interest posts, and so on. So much for time to explore…
So, I had a lot of empathy for the caller yesterday. The big firms are not going to hire someone who is not focused on a specific goal or who verbalizes “a desire to explore” a practice area. This works for your first or second summer in law school but usually not after graduation. It may be possible to explore various legal roles in the public sector or in medium-sized and smaller firms, but the world of “big firms” is not that flexible, especially in the current market conditions.
Regardless of whether this seems fair, parents, career counselors, and law schools need to know and explain the rules of the game if they are advising someone entering the law. Law students signing on to major debt need to understand at the front end of the process how to avoid the blind alleys that might prevent them from reaching their goals. Ideally, someone interested in pursuing the law can explore the broad options, e.g., big firm (transactional vs. litigation), smaller firm, public interest, in-house corporate, non-traditional roles, etc., before law school so they have a basic idea of their preferences. There are creative opportunities to intern, volunteer, observe and network with mentors to gain some perspective on the profession before having to make critical decisions with long-term ramifications.
In a challenging market, it is never too soon to start researching and strategically planning your career. Exploring and refining your practice interests after graduation in the context of a possible big firm career is rarely a viable option.

Build Your Book, Build Your Stable Future

“What’s your book?” is a question we recruiters regularly ask our senior candidates looking to make a move. The answer firms want to hear is, at least, “1.5 million.” That figure may sound intimidating to you if you’re just beginning your legal career but it’s an important goal to keep in mind for several reasons.

First, your stability as an attorney in a large firm is directly proportional to the amount of business that you bring in. The more business you bring to your firm, the better your chances are that you will be allowed to stay. Despite glossy brochures touting pro bono programs, law firms are business machines driven solely by the bottom line. You may be a terrific legal writer with enviable courtroom presence, but if you’re not bringing in business by the time you’re a 6th-8th year, your position at your firm becomes precarious.

Second, with a book of business comes leverage and with leverage comes options. “Up or out” is a phrase we often hear to describe the progress of attorneys within their firms’ hierarchy. If you are moving “up” that means that you are developing business contacts and bringing in clients while billing the requisite hours and producing sound work.

For those attorneys that have failed to move up and keep pace with their business developing peers, then they will be pushed out. The career lifespan of a big firm associate is relatively short, about 8 years, so it is extremely important to start developing business as soon as you know what a stipulation is and how to get one. Having your own book of business gives you leverage in your partnership negotiations and it gives you options should those negotiations leave you wanting.

Third, building a sizable book of business will earn you the respect of your colleagues. It shows that you understand that new business is the life blood of your firm and that you’re willing to make that extra effort to keep it pumping. Given the competitive market and the daily mega-mergers, it may come to be that “of counsel” and “non-equity partners” become relics of a bygone era. Making the extra time to network shows your firm that you’re committed to them which will, in turn, make them commit to you.

Fourth, building your book is not only financially rewarding, but also personally satisfying. One of the junior partners I used to work with at my old firm was a dynamo at bringing in new clients. He took pride in his talent and felt that it helped make up for some other areas of his practice where he wasn’t as strong. Plus, working on your own cases that you personally staked gives you some freedom and elbow room. In many cases, you will be the senior decision-maker which can be a very empowering experience.

Finally, building your book doesn’t have to be drudgery. With the advent of Facebook and LinkedIn, it’s become easier to re-connect with old contacts while developing new ones. So seek out your former classmates, take them to the Watergrill and get cracking!

(Check out the following website for some excellent tips on how to develop business: http://www.clientfocus.net/)

What’s On Your Facebook Page?

The National Law Journal recently published an article (http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202423725315&pos=ataglance) which discussed the fact that jury consultants and trial lawyers are now researching social networking sites and personal blogs to assist them in the voir dire process. Conducting Internet research has proven very useful by providing trial lawyers with valuable insight about potential jurors that is not readily apparent through voir dire. It appears that what people post on their MySpace or Facebook pages is far different from what they state on their jury questionnaires. For example, the article mentions a case where the defense successfully had a juror dismissed after discovering that the juror had lied on her questionnaire through an Internet search.

Jury consultants and trial lawyers are not the only ones who are using Internet research in this manner. Law firms often use the Internet as well to conduct informal background searches on potential lateral candidates. More and more firms are searching the Internet, especially social networking sites and personal blogs, to gain better insight into a potential candidate. Thus, before you start your job search, it is very important that the public information on your Facebook or MySpace page does not contain anything that you would not want a potential employer to know. After all, you never know who may be googling your name next.

Too Many Transitions Without Ever Having Moved–

In the legal recruiting business, too many transitions between firms can limit your mobility. Top AmLaw firms often will not tolerate more than one move in the first 5 -7 years of your associate career when considering whether to bring you in. Many associates know this and are very strategic and careful in making a move count and avoiding a potential “course correction” that will add another entry to the resume, often to their detriment.

But what do you do when your law firm has transitioned while you have literally “stayed put?” This dilemma came to mind today when I received an updated v-card from a very skilled senior associate. The only change from his previous contact information was the name of the firm and the email domain. Same address. Same phone. Same fax. And this was the third time this had happened in the last four years.

The Bay Area market may be at the forefront of this phenomena. It seems every week a new out of state firm is setting up shop in the Silicon Valley, usually by acquiring practice groups or taking on a another firm’s regional office that was unable to reach critical mass. When presenting resumes to Silicon Valley hiring personnel, especially in the areas of corporate practice and IP, there is some forgiveness for many “apparent transitions” if the “merger or acquisition” between firms is still relatively fresh in everyone’s mind. Candidates have developed the asterisk technique on resumes to label the current firm and then in a footnote name the prior firm who was acquired. Unfortunately, the “chain of title” on some of these resumes is getting long and the footnotes are beginning to distract.

What do you do if you are in this position? First, make sure you are aligned with strong senior attorneys in your group. Is there a reason for this lack of stability? What is the personality of your supervising partner? Why has the group been vulnerable to takeover? A multitude of factors can help you decide whether you are still on a positive career trajectory or whether the dynamics may cause this to repeat and repeat. You can get advice from many people in this regard, including your legal recruiter who is familiar with the “word on the street.”

Second, don’t be too complacent and assume the firm coming in is the correct firm for you if you were part of a “package deal.” Each firm has a personality. Each has a unique management system. Each operates with their own set of assumptions. Make sure that your goals and style are compatible with the new firm. It can be exhausting to have to go through this uncertainty every couple of years. The path of least resistance and driving to the same office each day can be attractive. But, are you poised to achieve your goals? You must do your own diligence as proactively as the acquiring firm has done theirs.
Third, if you see yourself moving into a market where these “footnotes” will be seen as career transitions, it behooves you to do everything in your power to limit more entries on your resume. It may be wise strategically to align yourself with a very established practice group that will be here in ten years if you plan to move to a new market in eight. And when you choose a legal recruiter who will represent you in the new market, make sure to choose someone who understands at the gut level your role or lack of a role in the transition. Find someone who knows how to explain the change of firms factually and in the best possible light to potential employers.
Mobility is a major theme in these times. In this market, it is not just candidates who are mobile, it is also law firms. When dealing with these forces, keep a sharp eye on your goals, don’t “just go along for the ride,” and use all the resources at hand to evaluate your options, including a savvy legal recruiter.
May your transitions be few and positive!

Dependents’ Day

It is ironic to me that just days after we celebrated our nation’s independence, I got a call from the parent of a young lawyer. Sadly, this isn’t unusual, it happens more often than you might imagine. I’m really terribly ambivalent about telephone calls that start “my son/daughter just graduated from law school and….” I’m ambivalent because who can criticize a well-meaning parent who is genuinely hoping to help their kid by gathering career advice? On the other hand, for those of us on the receiving end of the phone call, it can really undermine your child’s credibility. Er, I mean, your adult son or daughter’s credibility.

Also, it’s unprofessional.

On a cranky day, my instinct is just to say “tell them to call me directly” and hang up the phone. I’ve never been cranky enough to do it. I just try as best I can to answer their (the parents’) questions and send them in the right direction. I usually point out that it would *really* be better if their son or daughter was doing this work on their own behalf. I hear two responses. First I hear “oh well he or she is sooo busy.” Second, I hear that the parent is just trying to give them a kick in the pants to push them forward in their career. Neither of these excuses dull the absurdity, in my opinion. It certainly highlights the possibility that if your parents are doing the work of managing your legal career, you have more significant issues to overcome than time management.